An Empirical Evaluation of the Relationship Between Economic Growth, Population and Solid Waste Generation in India

IJEP 42(11): 1339-1345 : Vol. 42 Issue. 11 (November 2022)

Prerana Bhat, Ananya S. and Rajeshwari U.R.*

CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Department of Economics, Bangalore, Kamataka – 560 029, India

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) poses a hazard to the environment, human health and well-being and economic growth, if not managed correctly. It is essential to study the determinants of municipal solid waste generation for efficient waste management planning and achieving sustainable growth. The main objective of this paper is to establish a relationship between economic growth, population and MSW generation. Secondly, it aims to verify whether the environmental kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is valid in the Indian context with MSW generation as the proxy variable for environmental degradation. Panel regression has been run using statewise data of MSW generation, state net domestic product (SNDP) per capita and population for the years 2000-2019. The results show a significant positive relationship between the selected variables. Least square regression was applied to verify the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India using nationwide data for MSW generation and GDP per capita for the years mentioned above. The results depicted inverted U-shaped curve with MSW as the dependent variable and GDP per capita as the independent variable and confirmed the validity of the EKC hypothesis.

Keywords

Municipal solid waste generation, Economic growth, Population, Sustainable development,  Panel regression, Environmental kuznets curve

References

  1. Karak, T., R.M. Bhagat and P. Bhattacharya. 2012. Municipal solid waste generation, composition and management : The world scenario. Critical Reviews Env. Sci. Tech., 42(15):1509-1630.
  2. Beede, D.N. and D.E. Bloom. 1985. The economics of municipal solid waste. The World Bank Res. Observer. 10(2):113-150.
  3. Chattopadhyay, S., A. Dutta and S. Ray. 2009. Municipal solid waste management in Kolkata, India-A review. Waste Manage., 29 (4):1449-1458.
  4. CPCB. 2016. C. bulletin. Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi. Available at : https://india.org/scbp/sites/default/files/CPCB%202016%20 report. pdf.
  5. Kalyani, K.A. and K.K. Pandey. 2014. Waste to energy status in India : A short review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Reviews. 31:113-120.
  6. Singh, C.K., A. Kumar and S.S. Roy. 2018. Quantitative analysis of the methane gas emissions from municipal solid waste in India. Scientific reports.
  7. Khatib, I. 2011. Municipal solid waste management in developing countries : Future challenges and possible opportunities. In Integrated waste management (Vol II). IntechOpen.
  8. Sharma, K.D. and S. Jain. 2019. Overview of municipal solid waste generation, composition and management in India. J. Env. Eng., 145(3):040 18143.
  9. Lebersorger, S. and P. Beigi. 2011. Municipal solid waste generation in municipalities: Quantifying impacts of household structure, commercial waste and domestic fuel. Waste Manage., 31(9-10):1907-1915.
  10. Kolekar, K., T. Hazra and S. Chakrabarty. 2016. A review on prediction of municipal solid waste generation models. Procedia Env. Sci., 35:238-244.
  11. Gupta, B. and S.K. Arora. 2016. Municipal solid waste management in Delhi- the capital of India. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Tech., 5(4):5130-5138.
  12. Dinda, S. 2004. Environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol. Eco., 49(4):431-455.
  13. Raymond, L. 2004. Economic growth as environmental policy? Reconsidering the environmental kuznets curve. J. Public Policy. 24(3):327-348.
  14. Alajmi, R.G. 2016. The relationship between economic growth and municipal solid waste and testing the EKC hypothesis : Analysis for Saudi Arabia. J. Int. Business Res. Marketing. 1(5):20-25.
  15. Khajuria, A., T. Matsui and T. Machimura. 2011. Economic growth decoupling municipal solid waste loads in terms of environmental kuznets curve: Symptom of the decoupling in India. J. Sustain. Develop., 4(3):1670-1973.
  16. Cole, M., A. Rayner and J. Bates. 1997. The environmental Kuznets curve : An empirical analysis. Env. Develop. Economics. 2(4):401-416.
  17. He, J. 2007. Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis valid for developing countries? A survey. Research notebooks 07-03. Department of Economics, School of Management, University of Sherbooke.
  18. Mazzanti, M. 2008. Is waste generation delinking from economic growth? Empirical evidence for Europe. Appl. Economics Letters. 15(4):287-291.
  19. Liu, et al. 2019. The impact of consumption patterns on the generation of municipal solid waste in China : Evidences from provincial data. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health. 16(10).
  20. CPCB. 2013. Statewise estimated waste generation in the country. Annual report. Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi. Available at : https://data.gov.in/resources/state-wise-estimated-waste-generation-country-ministry-urban-development.
  21. MoEFCC. 2019. State/UT-wise status of solid waste generated and processed from 2016. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, New Delhi.
  22. MoEFCC. 2020. State/UT-wise generation of solid waste and quantity of waste being. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate change, Government of India, New Delhi.
  23. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Download tables/data/MOSPI (data set). Directorate of Economics and Statistics of respective state governments.
  24. Tam, V.W. 2008. On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management plan method in construction. Waste Manage., 28(6):1072-1080.
  25. The technical group on population projections constituted by the National Commission on Population. 2006. Population projections for India and states 2001-2006.