An investigation on analytical techniques and Statistical Design for tertiary treatment of secondary wastewater using Zetag-4120 coagulant

IJEP 43(13): 1186-1196 : Vol. 43 Issue. 13 (Conference 2023)

Priya Singh, Mahendra Kumar Pal*, Prabhat Kumar Singh Dikshit and Goutham Banerjee

Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Department of Civil Engineering, Varanasi – 221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The primary and secondary treatments of wastewaters are important not only for the removal of pollutants but also for the use of treated water. The latter involves the use of suitable coagulants at their optimal dosages. The present study was carried out to identify the most suitable coagulant for tertiary treatment and its optimal dosage to achieve the maximum removal of total suspended solids (TSS) and biological oxygen demand (BOD). In the study, we used six coagulants (alum, ferric chloride, poly-aluminium chloride (PAC), Zetag-4120, Mecafloc-25 and Rothfloc-27) and found that Zetag-4120 is cost-efficient coagulant. We arrived at this conclusion based on several experiments performed using varying coagulant dosages. Furthermore, the regression prediction models for BOD and TSS removal for coagulant Zetag-4120 have been generated using statistical models and validated by calculating R2 value, F-test and lack-of-fit test using ANOVA. Analysis suggests the optimal dosage, initial wastewater pH and settling time to be 1.86 mg/L, 6.73 and 89.12 min, respectively. Furthermore, BOD and TSS removal efficiency values were 50.0% and 92.4%, respectively. The treated wastewater has BOD and TSS equal to 12.27 and 5.66 mg/L, respectively, conforming to the standard for re-usability of treated water in unrestricted irrigation.

Keywords

Tertiary wastewater treatment, polyelectrolytes, Zetag 4120, Response surface methodology, Regression prediction model

References

  1. Hamilton, A. J., et al. 2006. Quantitative microbial risk assessment models for consumption of raw vegetables irrigated with reclaimed water. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 72(5): 3284-3290. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3284-3290.2006.
  2. Mok, H., S. F. Barker and A.J. Hamilton. 2014. A probabilistic quantitative microbial risk assessment model of norovirus disease burden from wastewater irrigation of vegetables in. Water Res., 54: 347-362.
  3. Symonds, E.M., et al. 2014. A case study of enteric virus removal and insights into the associated risk of water reuse for two wastewater treatment pond systems in Bolivia. Water Res., 65: 257270. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres. 2014.07.032.
  4. US EPA. 2004. Guidelines for water reuse. EPA/625/R-04/108. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  5. Gerstl, Z. and E.R. Graber. 2011. Impact of irrigation with treated wastewater on pesticides and other organic microcontaminants in soils. In Treated wastewater in agriculture: Use and impacts on the soil environment and crops. Ed Guy J. Levy, Pinchas Fine and Asher Bar-Tal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp 382-399.
  6. Shuval, H. 2011. Health considerations in the recycling of water and use of treated wastewater in agriculture and other non-potable purposes. In Treated wastewater in agriculture: Use and impacts on the soil environment and crops, Ed : Guy J. Levy, Pinchas Fine and Asher Bar-Tal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp 51-76.
  7. Chen, Y., et al. 2011. Organic matter in wastewater and treated wastewater-irrigated soils: Properties and effects. In Treated wastewater in agriculture: Use and impacts on the soil environment and crops. Ed Guy J. Levy, Pinchas Fine and Asher Bar-Tal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp 400-417.
  8. Battistone, A., et al. 2014. Detection of enteroviruses in influent and effluent flow samples from wastewater treatment plants in Italy. Food Env. Virol., 6(1): 13-22. DOI: 10.1007/s12560-013-9132-2.
  9. Peasey, A.B., et al. 2000. Guidelines for wastewater reuse in agriculture and aquaculture: Recommended revisions based on new research evidence (task no: 68, part 1). Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough (WELL), Loughborough University, UK.
  10. WHO. 2006. Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. Volume II: Wastewater use in agriculture. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  11. Russo, D. 2011. Analysis of transport of mixed Na/Ca salts in a three-dimensional heterogeneous variably saturated soil. In Treated wastewater in agriculture: Use and impacts on the soil environment and crops. Ed. Guy J. Levy, Pinchas Fine and Asher Bar-Tal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp 418-437.
  12. Donia, D., et al. 2010. Statistical correlation between enterovirus genome copy numbers and infectious viral particles in wastewater samples. Letters Appl. Microbiol., 50: 237-240. DOI: 10.111 1/j.1472-765X.2009.02775. x.
  13. Dickin, S. K., et al. 2016. A review of health risks and pathways for exposure to wastewater use in agriculture. Env. Health Perspectives. 124(7): 900-909. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509995.
  14. Nikolaos, V., et al. 2011. Irrigation with recycled water: Guidelines and regulations. In Treated wastewater in agriculture: Use and impacts on the soil environment and crops. Ed Guy J. Levy, Pinchas Fine and Asher Bar-Tal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp 77-112.
  15. Mareddy, A.R. 2017. Environmental impact assessment: Theory and practice. Elsevier Ltd.: Butter-worth-Heinemann.
  16. Prakash, K.J., et al. 2007. Post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent by coagulation and flocculation process. Env. Progress. 26(2). DOI: 10.1002/ep.
  17. Diamadopolous, E., et al. 2007. Coagulation and precipitation as post-treatment of anaerobically treated primary municipal wastewater. Water Env. Res., 79: 131-139.
  18. Abdelaal, A.M. 2004. Using a natural coagulant for treating wastewater. Eighth International water technology Conference (IWTC8At): Alexandria, Egypt. Proceedings, pp 781-792. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2193.5845.
  19. APHA. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st edn). American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
  20. IS 3025. 2001. Methods of sampling and tests (physical and chemical) for water and wastewater. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  21. Khuri, A.I. and J.A. Cornell. 1996. Response surface, design and analyses (2nd edn). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.
  22. Montgomery, D.C. 2001. Design and analysis of experiments (5th edn). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. pp 427-510.
  23. Ferreira, S.L.C., et al. 2007. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal. Chim. Acta. 597(2): 179-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011.
  24. APHA. 2013. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (22nd edn). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  25. Trinh, T.K. and L.S. Kang. 2010. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the coagulation drinking water treatment. Chem. Eng. Res. Design. 9: 11261135. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.20 10.12.004.
  26. Myers, R.H., D.C. Montgomery and C.M. anderson-Cook. 2009. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (2nd edn). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  27. Noordin, M. Y., et al. 2004. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J. Mater. Processing Tech., 145(1): 46-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6.
  28. Mason, R.L., R.F. Gunst and J.L. Hess. 2003. Statistical design and analysis of experiments with applications to engineering and science (2nd edn). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  29. Beg, Q., V. Sahai and R. Gupta. 2003. Statistical media optimization and alkaline protease production from Bacillus mojavensis in a bioreactor. Process Biochem., 39: 203-209.
  30. Anderson, M.J. and F.J. Whitcomb. 2005. RSM simplified: Optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments (2nd edn). Productivity Press, New York, USA.
  31. Ghafari, S., et al. 2009. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J. Hazard. Mater., 3: 650-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.200 8.07.090.
  32. Costa, N.R., J. Lourenco and Z.L. Pereira. 2011. Desirability functional approach: a review and performance evaluation in adverse condition. Chem. Itell. Lab. Syst., 107: 234-244.
  33. Montgomery, D.C. 2010. Design and analysis of experiments (7th edn). Wiley India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  34. Region, E. M. 2006. A compendium of standards for wastewater reuse in the Eastern Mediterranean region. World Health Organization. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.060.