Assessment of Environmental Flow using Hydrological Methods in the Gandak River, Bihar – A Case Study

IJEP 43(13): 1197-1204 : Vol. 43 Issue. 13 (Conference 2023)

Rahul Ray1*, K. Praveen2 and L.B. Roy3

1. GLA University, Department of Civil Engineering, Mathura – 281 406, Uttar Pradesh, India
2. Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Tirupati – 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
3. National Institute of Technology, Patna, Department of Civil Engineering, Patna – 800 005, Bihar, India

Abstract

The concept of minimum flow, which was once thought to be inadequate for aquatic systems to exist, sparked the creation of environment flow research. Rivers are subjected to a variety of factors that enhance their flows, including hydropower plants, flood dams and irrigation canals. Several types of research have been conducted in order to mitigate the harmful impacts of these constructions on waterways. Environmental flow research has grown as water has become the most important component that must be protected along the riverbed. For the assessment of environmental flow, different hydrological methods are used, namely the annual distribution (AMD), flow duration curve analysis (FDCA), low flow index and the tennant method in the Gandak river in Bihar, India. The annual distribution method revealed low alteration compared to the tennant method of hydrological alterations and environmental flow components, allowing us to conclude that the AMD method is better than the tennant method. As a result of the study’s findings, it was found that the annual distribution method is more appropriate for e-flow implementation to satisfy the annual dynamic demand of the riverine ecosystem and thereby preserve the river’s health. This case study may be utilized as a reference point for allocating environmental flows in the Gandak river, especially for small hydropower facilities.

Keywords

Environmental flow, Annual distribution method, Tennant method, Gandak river, Bihar

References

  1. Tare, V., et al. 2017. Eco-geomorphological approach for environmental flows assessment in monsoon-driven highland rivers: A case study of upper Ganga, India. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 13: 110-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.005.
  2. Couto, T.B. and J.D. Olden. 2018. Global proliferation of small hydropower plants- Science and policy. Front. Ecol. Env., 16: 91–100.
  3. Karimi, S.S., M. Yasi and S. Eslamian. 2012. Use of hydrological methods for assessment of environmental flow in a river reach. Int. J. Env. Sci. Tech., 9: 549–558.
  4. Pearce, F. 2007. When the rivers run dry: what happens when our water runs out? Transworld Publishers, London, UK.
  5. Ali, R., et al. 2019. Long-term trends and seasonality detection of the observed flow in Yangtze river using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s innovative trend method. Water. 11: 1855.
  6. Kuriqi, A., et al. 2020. Seasonality shift and stream flow flow variability trends in central India. Acta Geophys., 68: 1461–1475.
  7. Pyrce, R. 2004. Hydrological low flow indices and their uses. WSC report no. 4. Watershed Science Centre, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario.
  8. Suwal, N., et al. 2019. Assessment of hydrological alteration and selection of representative hydrological indicators in Erdu river. The 8th International Conference on Water resources and environment research. Nanjing, China.
  9. Tharme, R.E. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res. Appl., 19: 397- 441.
  10. Gilron, J. 2014. Water-energy nexus: matching sources and uses. Clean Tech. Env. Policy. 16: 1471-1479.
  11. Gao, Y., et al. 2019. Estimation of hydrologic alteration in Kaligandaki river using representative hydrologic indices. Water. 11: 688.
  12. Huang, X. 2019. Hydrological alteration assessment by histogram comparison approach: A case study of Erdu river basin, China. J. Coast. Res., 93: 139–145.
  13. Babel, M.S., et al. 2012. Operation of a hydropower system considering environmental flow requirements: a case study in La Nga river basin, Vietnam. J. Hydrol. env. Res., 6(1): 63-73.
  14. Cioffi, F. and F. Gallerano. 2012. Multi-objective analysis of dam release flows in rivers downstream from hydropower reservoirs. Appl. Math. Model. 36(7): 2868-2889.
  15. Hu, W.W. 2008. The influence of dams on ecohydro-logical conditions in the Huaihe river basin, China. Ecol. Eng., 33(3): 233-241.
  16. Karakoyun, Y., A.H. Dconmez and Z. Yumurtaci. 2018. Comparison of environmental flow assessment methods with a case study on a runoff river type hydropower plant using hydrological methods. Env. Monit. Assess., 190: 722. DOI: 10.1007/s106 61-018-7107-3.
  17. Naresh, S., et al. 2020. Environmental flows assessment in Nepal: The case of Kaligandaki river. Sustain., 12: 8766. doi: 10.3390/su12218766.
  18. Roy, L. B. and K. Praveen. 2022. Study of soil erosion by using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Sone command area in Bihar, India. Mater. Today Proceedings. 62: 1664–1670.
  19. Smakhtin, V.U. 2001. Low flow hydrology: a review. J. Hydrol., 240(3–4): 147–186.
  20. Tennant, D.L. 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries. 1(4): 6-10. DOI: 10.1577/1548 – 8446 (1976) 001<006:IFRFFW>2.0.CO:2.
  21. El-Jabi, N. and D. Caissie. 2019. Characterization of natural and environmental flows in New Bruns-wick, Canada. River Res. Appl., 35(1): 14-24. DOI: 10.1002/rra.3387.
  22. Petts, G.E. 2009. Instream flow science for sustainable river management. J. American Water Resour. Assoc., 45(5): 1071-1086.
  23. Roy, L.B. and K. Praveen. 2022. Study of ET0 by using soft computing techniques in the eastern Gandak project in Bihar, India- A case study. In Soft computing: Theories and applications. Lecture notes in networks and systems (vol 425). Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0707-4_47.
  24. Smakhtin, V.U. and N. Eriyagama. 2008. Developing a software package for global desktop assessment of environmental flows. Env. Model. Software. 23(12): 1396-1406.
  25. Stamou, A., et al. 2018. Determination of environmental flows in rivers using an integrated hydrological-hydrodynamic-habitat modelling approach. J. Env. Manage., 209: 273-285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenv man.2017.12.038.
  26. Praveen, K. and L.B. Roy. 2022. Assessment of irrigation and agricultural potential of the Sone command area in Bihar, India applying geospatial techniques. J. Current Sci. Tech., 12(3): 568-581. DOI: 10.14456/jcst.2022.43.
  27. Ray, R., S.S. Choudhary and L.B. Roy. 2021. Reliability analysis of layered soil slope stability using ANFIS and MARS soft computing techniques. Int. J. Performability Eng., 17: 647. doi: 10.23940/IJPE.21.07.P9.647656.
  28. Sarah, P., et al. 2018. Evaluation of low-flow metrics as environmental in stream flow standards during long-term average and 2016 drought conditions: Tombigbee river basin, Alabama and Mississippi, USA. Water Poll., 20(6): 1240-1255. DOI: 10.2166/wp.2018.023.
  29. Arthington, A.H., et al. 2004. Environmental flow assessment with emphasis on holistic methodologies. Second International Symposium on the Management of large rivers for fisheries. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. pp 37-65.
  30. Liu, J., Q. Liu and H. Yang. 2016. Assessing water scarcity by simultaneously considering environmental flow requirements, water quantity and water quality. Ecol. Indicat., 60: 434-441.
  31. Hirji, R. and R. Davis. 2009. Environmental flows in water resources policies, plans and projects: Findings and recommendations. Environment and Development, World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7940-0.
  32. King, A., et al. 2016. Using abiotic drivers of fish spawning to inform environmental flow management. J. Appl. Ecol., 53 (1): 34-43. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12542.
  33. Praveen, K. and L. B. Roy. 2021a. Study of groundwater quality for irrigation purpose- A case study of Paliganj distributary, Bihar, India. Natural Vola-tiles Essential Oils J., 8(6): 3461-3477.
  34. Praveen, K. and L.B. Roy. 2021b. Study of reference evapotranspiration based deficit irrigation in the Sone command area in Bihar, India – A case study. Natural Volatiles Essential Oils J., 8(6): 1242- 1255.
  35. Praveen, K. and L.B. Roy. 2022. Assessment of groundwater quality using water quality indices: A case study of Paliganj distributary, Bihar, India. Eng. Tech. Appl. Sci. Res., 12(1): 8199–8203. DOI: 10.48084/etasr.4696.
  36. Ray, R., S.S. Choudhary and L.B. Roy. 2021. Reliability analysis of soil slope stability using MARS, GPR and FN soft computing techniques. Model. Earth Syst. Env., 1–11. doi: 10.1007/S40808-021-01238-W.
  37. Zhou, Y. 2022. Bimetallic metal–organic frameworks and MOF-derived composites: Recent progress on electro-and photo electrocatalytic applications. Coordination Chem. Reviews. 451: 214-264.
  38. Zhang, X.R., D.R. Zhang and Y. Ding. An environmental flow method applied in small and medium-sized mountainous rivers. Water Sci. Eng., 14(4): 323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2021.10.003.
  39. Yadav, P. and K. Shah. 2021. Quinolines, a perpetual, multipurpose scaffold in medicinal chemistry. Bioorganic Chem., 109: 104639.
  40. Yasin, G., et al. 2022. Defects-engineered tailoring of tri-doped interlinked metal-free bifunctional catalyst with lower gibbs free energy of OER/HER intermediates for overall water splitting. Mater. Today Chem., 23: 100634.
  41. Yasin, G. 2021. Defective/graphitic synergy in a heteroatom-interlinked-triggered metal-free electro-catalyst for high-performance rechargeable zinc–air batteries. J. Mater. Chem., 9(34):18222-18230.
  42. Karakoyun, Y., Z. Yumurtaci and A.H. Dönmez. 2018. Environmental flow assessment methods: A case study (chapter 4.9). In Exergetic, energetic and environmental dimensions. pp 1061-1074. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813734-5.00060-3.
  43. Yiping, F., et al. 2010. Exploitation scale of hydropower based on instream flow requirements: A case from southwest China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Reviews. 14: 2290-2297.