IJEP 44(12): 1097-1107 : Vol. 44 Issue. 12 (December 2024)
1. Heritage Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Kolkata – 700 107, West Bengal, India
2. Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Kolkata – 700 150, West Bengal, India
3. Jadavpur University, Department of Civil Engineering, Kolkata – 700 032, West Bengal, India
Abstract
Estimation of water footprints for institutional campuses is one of the measures to identify the water-guzzling sectors, decide upon policies to increase water efficiency and identify the dynamics and complex relationships of water, energy and food. This study estimates the water footprint (WF) of a higher educational institute campus in Kolkata, India, for 2022. The study estimates both the campus’s direct and indirect water footprint components and compares them with the findings of other existing studies. The total WF of the said institute is estimated as 999706 m3/year and the per-capita total WF is calculated to be 118 m3/year. The study also revealed the water footprint of direct and indirect components. The direct WF is computed as 42647 m3/year, while the indirect WF accounted for a total of 957059 m3/year. Amongst all the components, food contributed towards the highest proportion of water footprint, that is around 95.5%.
Keywords
Direct water footprint, Indirect water footprint, Water-food-energy, Educational institute campus
References
- UNICEF. 2023. Drinking water: Drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) estimates. UNICEF. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/topic/water-and-sanitation/drinking-water/.
- NITI Aayog. 2019. Composite water management index. Avilable at: https://social.niti.gov.in/uploads/sample/water_index_report2.pdf.
- Hoekstra, A.Y., et al. 2011. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan.
- Hoekstra, A.Y. and A.K. Chapagain. 2007. Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour. Manage., 21: 35–48. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x.
- Hoekstra, A. Y. 2009. Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecol. Eco., 68(7): 1963-1974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.021.
- Hoekstra, A.Y. 2017. Water footprint assessment: Evolvement of a new research field. Water Resour. Manage., 31(10): 3061-3081. DOI: 10.1007/s1126 9-017-1618-5.
- Natyzak, J.L., et al. 2017. Virtual water as a metric for institutional sustainability. Sustain. J. Record. 10(4): 237-245. DOI: 10.1089/sus.2017.0004.
- Yagoub, M.M., et al. 2019. Pattern of water use at the United Arab Emirates university. Water. 11 (12): 2652. DOI: 10.3390/w11122652.
- Okutan, P. and A. Akkoyunlu. 2021. Identification of water use behaviour and calculation of water footprint: A case study. Appl. Water Sci., 11: 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-021-01459-5.
- Özbas, E. E. 2021. Distribution of water footprint components of university students and detecting the factors that affect those components. Int. J. Agric. Env. Food Sci., 5(4): 456-463. DOI: 10.310 15/jaefs.2021.4.4.
- Tejada, J.L.O., M.V. Hoyos and T.M. Pinzón. 2022. Comprehensive water footprint of a university campus in Colombia: Impact of wastewater treatment modelling. Water Air Soil Poll., 233(5): 174. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-022-05644-3.
- Gu, Y., et al. 2019. Quantification of interlinked environmental footprints on a sustainable university campus: A nexus analysis perspective. Appl. Energy. 246: 65-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2019.04.015.
- Vaidya, B., S. Shrestha and A. Ghimire. 2020. Water footprint assessment of food-water-energy systems at Kathmandu University, Nepal. Curr. Res. Env. Sustain., 3: 100044. DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust. 2021.100044.
- NBC. 2016. Guide for using national building code of India.
- CESC. 2022. ESG report for financial year 2021-22. Availabe at: https://www.cesc.co.in/storage/uploads/sustainability/CESC%20ESG% 20Report%202021.
- Mekonnen, M.M., P.W. Gerbens-Leenes and A.Y. Hoekstra. 2015. The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: A global assessment. Env. Sci. Water Res. Tech., 1(3): 285-297. DOI: 10.103 9/C5EW00026B.
- Usher, P.K., et al. 2014. An overview of the potential environmental impacts of large-scale microalgae cultivation. Biofuels. 5(3): 331-349. DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2014.913925.
- Das, K., P.G. Leenes and S. Nonhebel. 2021. The water footprint of food and cooking fuel: A case study of self-sufficient rural India. J. Clean. Prod., 281: 125255. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125 255.
- Mekonnen, M.M. and A.Y. Hoekstra. 2011. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth System Sci., 15(5): 1577-1600. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011.
- Mekonnen, M.M. and A.Y. Hoekstra. 2011. National water footprint accounts: The green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption value of water research report series no 50. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands.
