IJEP 44(13): 1183-1191 : Vol. 44 Issue. 13 (Conference 2024)
Saurabh Pandey1 and Bhavtosh Sharma2*
1. Dev Sanskriti Viswavidyalaya, Department of Environmental Science, Haridwar – 249 411, Uttarakhand, India
2. Uttarakhand Science Education Research Centre (USERC), Dehradun – 248 001, Uttarakhand, India
Abstract
Human avarice is the main root cause of current environmental challenges, which affects every living creature on the earth; thus, it becomes crucial to have a scientific grasp of and in-depth research on different components of a natural resource in order to ensure its sustainable utilization. Uttarakhand has a total of 103882 ha of wetland area, which is 1.94% of the total geographical area. It comprises a total of 118 lakes which are located at high altitudes and cover 231 ha area. The Asan Conservation Reserve is the only Ramsar site in Uttarakhand. The presented study is an attempt to assess the ecological status of Asan Conservation Reserve, a wetland and recently declared Ramsar site in district Dehradun of Uttarakhand. The study has been carried out with the objective of determining the status of different ecological components of the Asan wetland. The study includes both primary and secondary sources of data, such as field and laboratory analysis, questionnaire method and plant biodiversity study. After meticulous analysis, a manuscript was prepared, integrating the results of water quality analysis and social and plant diversity. The study found that all the parameters of water quality were under designated criteria for use. The pH value was recorded from 7.45-8.63 with an average of 8.1. A large spatial variation was found in turbidity, which was between 1.91-7.53, with an average of 4.43 NTU. The spatial variation in alkalinity has been found in the range of 6-8 mg/L, with an average mean of 25 mg/L. The concentration of chloride varied from 79.9-199.9 mg/L. Hardness ranges from 80-128 mg/L. Dissolved oxygen level recorded was 7.9 mg/L; according to CPCB’s designated best use criteria, it is found fit for class D. Average concentration of hydrogen sulphide was 4.75 mg/L, reported from the study site. Industrial processes are a major cause of hydrogen sulphide. Wood pulp, tannin, dye, wood production, etc., are the areas where it is used. Asan river covers a long journey and industrial effluent is discharged into it. These could be the possible source of increased sulphide in the reservoir. Presences of fecal coliform were found, which makes water unfit for direct human consumption. Aquatic and terrestrial weeds are the threat of concern. Growth of invasive weeds, like waterlily, Tora plants, Lantana, etc., were recorded from the study site. Visual observation and recording of plants around the wetland were done during the field study. Socio-economic analysis was conducted to determine the utilization pattern and dependency of people on wetlands. What we got through it is that the Asan wetland is a major source of fodder for livestock and weeds; trees around the reservoir are a source of fodder. Secondly, water is used for irrigation by using an electrical motor. Direct employment generation from the resource is quite low. The survey revealed that the avian population decreased in the last two years. This is further examined by secondary sources and we found that in 2020, the least number of birds visited Asan. However, the study is not able to give an accurate answer to the question of what is the dominant factor that leads to the decline in the population of birds. Identified potential threats gradually deteriorating the quality of Asan are organic debris, alongwith polythene, which causes trouble for the health of water birds, unsustainable tourism, encroachment and increasing human demand and the growth of invasive weeds. Many wetlands in Uttarakhand are facing ignorance. They are small in size, but their ecological significance is invaluable. The distribution of funds should be more strategic. Recognition and development of such wetlands would also lead to the sustainable development of rural villages. State-level efforts are needed on priority basis for conservation of such resources.
Keywords
Asan Conservation Reserve, Wetland, Ecological status, Biodiversity, Physico-chemical analysis
References
- Prasad, S.N., et al. 2002. Conservation of wetlands of India– A review. Tropical Ecol., 43(1): 173-186.
- Ramsar. 1974. Available at : https://www.ramsar. org/wetland/india.
- National wetldand inventory assessment. Wetland of international importance under Ramsar convention. SAC/EPSA/ABHG/NWIA/ATLAS/38/2013. Space Applications Centre.
- Available at : http://vedas. sac. gov. in/vedas/downloads/ertd/wetland/p-2-wetland-database-preperation-j-g-patel.pdf. ved.
- Available at : http://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in-etext.pdf.
- Available at : http://moef.gov.in/wp-content/upload/2018/03/ National plan for conservation-of-aquatic-eco-system-o. pdf.
- Sharma, B., P. Singh and R. Dobhal. 2017. Education on drinking water quality and its health impacts among students and community people. 5(4): 400-408.
- MoEFCC. 2017. Guidelines for implementing wetlands. Conservation and Management Rules 2017. Available at : moef. gov. in 2020/01/03.pdf.
- Wetlands of Uttarakhand. 2012. Report published by the Uttarakhand Forest Department and WWF India. Available at : http://forest.uk.gov.in/pages/display/159/wetlands.
- National Wetland Atlas, Uttarkhand. SAC/EPSA/ABHG/NWIA/ATLAS/24/201. Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad, India.
- U.S. EPA. 2002. Methods for evaluating wetland conditions : Study design for monitoring wetlands. EPA-822-R-02-015. Office of water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at : http://www.epa/gov/ost/standards.
- Odonkor, T.S. and K.J. Ampafo. 2013. Escherichia coli as an indicator of bacteriological quality of water : An overview. Microbiol. Res., 4: e 2.
- IS 10500. 2012. Drinking water. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
- Singh, R. and A.P. Misra. Physico-chemical characteristics of Asan wetland with reference to avain and molluscon diversity, Doon valley (Uttarakhand), India. Int. Res. J. Env. Sci., 8(3):1-11.
- Rawat, U.S. and N.K. Agarwal. 2015. Biodiversity concept, threats and conservation. Env. Cons. J., 16(3):19-28.
- Ayer, D.K., B.K. Joshi and D. Gauchan. 2020. Participatory agrobiodiversity tools and methodologies (PATaM) in Nepal. NAGRC, LI-BIRD and alliance of biodiversity international and CIAT, Kathmandu, Nepal. pp 16-17.
- Tyagi, S., et al. 2015. Spatial and temporal variation in quality of drinking water source of Dehradun districti in India. Int. J. Env. Tech. Manage., 18(5/6).
- CPCB. Water quality criteria. Central Pollution Control Board. Available at : https ://cpcb.nic.in/water-quality-criteria/.
- Kumar, S. and S. Pandey. 2015. An ethnobotanical study of local plants and their medicinal importance in Tons river area Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Indian J. Trop. Biodiv., 23(2):227-231.
- Manwal, S. and S.P. Joshi. 2013. Medicinal plants from the landfill site of Doon valley. IOSR J. Pharmacy Biosci., 5:36-42.
- Bisht, A.S. and A.B. Bhatt. 2012. Contribution to medicinal plants of Sahastradhara district, Dehradun, Uttarakhand (with ethenobotanical notes). J. Drug Delivery Therapeutics. 2(5):114-120.
- Sharma, A. 2018. Sad: The number of migratory birds is decreasing due to human interference. Available at : https://www.livehindustan.com/uttarakhand/story-zsi-research-pin-points-reduce-in-flocking-of-migratory-birds-due-to-human-interference-2051801.html
- Kumar, A. 2003. Assessment and monitoring of migratory waterfowl habitat using remote sensing techniques. Fauna Asan Wetland, Wetland Ecosystem Series. 5:53-56.
- K.D.R. 2012. The wetlands jurisprudence in India: A case study of the west Bengal conservation and management of management of wetlands and waterbodies policy 2012. India Environment Portal.
- Singh, A., et al. 2016. Water birds of selected wetlands of Uttarakhand. Water bird India. 16:140-159.
- Available at : https://www.ramsar.org/default/files/documents/importftp/COP13NR_India_e.pdf.