Assessing the Efficacy of Sound Level Meter Mobile Apps with Reference Sound Level Meter to Screen Environmental Noise Pollution

IJEP 44(7): 630-636 : Vol. 44 Issue. 7 (July 2024)

Shunmathi Babu and Gladius Jennifer H.*

SRM Institute of Science and Technology, School of Public Health, Kattankulathur – 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Environmental noise pollution has become a growing concern in urban areas due to its adverse effects on human health and well-being. The advent of mobile applications that claim to measure sound levels has made it easier for individuals to assess noise pollution in their surroundings. However, the accuracy and reliability of these mobile apps in comparison to reference sound level meters are not well-documented. This research study aims to assess the efficacy of sound level meter mobile apps concerning their ability to screen environmental noise pollution when compared to a calibrated reference sound level meter. The clinical testing was completed to short list the apps by critical tests, such as measuring pure tones from speakers in different intensities (20, 50, 90, 100 and 120 dB); octave frequencies (250-8000 Hz) and 2 different distances alongwith reference sound level meter. Further the apps were assessed at 6 locations of Chennai in 2 different time zones (peak time), in the morning and evening. Minimum and maximum intensities were measured to test precision of applications in environmental noise. Repeated measures of ANOVA revealed significant results among SLM android and IOS readings. Kruskal Wallis test revealed significant results for evening readings (5-6 pm: H=2, P=0.001; 6-7 pm: H=2, P=0.002) across SLM android and IOS. This shows that 3 measurements significantly differ from each other in environmental noise screening. Mann Whitney test revealed insignificant results between the readings of IOS and android, which shows that android and IOS measures noise levels with some similarity to SLM; therefore, these apps can be used as a screening tool to measure and monitor environmental noise.

Keywords

Smartphone, Environmental noise pollution, Sound level meter apps, Noise monitoring, Urban noise, Sound measurement, Smartphone sound apps, Noise guidelines

References

  1. WHO. 2011. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  2. WHO. 2018. Environmental noise guidelines for the European region. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  3. Basner, M., et al. 2014. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 383 (9925): 1325-1332.
  4. Münzel, T., et al. 2020. Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. J. American College Cardiol., 71(6): 688-697.
  5. Münzel, T., et al. 2014. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. European Heart J., 35(13): 829-836.
  6. Pew Research Centre. 2014. Cell phone and smartphone ownership demographics. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/
    cell-phone-and-smartphone-ownership-demographics/.
  7. Kanjo, E. 2010. NoiseSPY: A real-time mobile phone platform for urban noise monitoring and mapping. Mobile Networks Applications. 15: 562-574.
  8. Kardous, C. A. and P. B. Shaw. 2014. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. J. Acoustical Soc. America. 135(4): EL186-EL192.
  9. Nast, D.R., W. Speer and C.G. Prell. 2014. Sound level measurements using smartphone ‘apps’: useful or inaccurate? Noise Health. 16: 251-256.
  10. ISO 3741. 1999. Acoustics: Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure- Precision methods for reverberation rooms. International Organization for Standardisation.
  11. Murphy, E. and E.A. King. 2010. Strategic environmental noise mapping: Methodological issues concerning the implementation of the EU environmental noise directive and their policy implications. Env. Int., 36: 290-298.
  12. Murphy, E. and E.A. King. 2014. Environmental noise pollution: Noise mapping, public health and policy. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  13. King, E.A., E. Murphy and H.J. Rice. 2011. Evaluating the impact on noise levels of a ban on private cars in Dublin city centre, Ireland. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Env., 16: 532-539.
  14. D’Hondt, E., M. Stevens and A. Jacobs. 2003. Participatory noise mapping works! An evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring. Pervasive Mobile Computing. 9: 681-694.
  15. Smith, A. 2015. U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Pew Research Centre.