The Impact of Ethanol-Dried Fruit Extract of Terminalia chebula on Lycopersicum esculentum in Environment-Friendly Manner

IJEP 44(8): 695-704 : Vol. 44 Issue. 8 (August 2024)

A. Padmalatha* and S. B. Prabha

Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, Old Pallavaram, Chennai – 600 117, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Biostimulant is an emerging method to manage crops to increase productivity in a controlled environment. The phytochemicals present in Terminalia chebula dried fruit ethanol extract, tested for its biostimulant ability, were studied in detail because of its less impact on environment than synthetic compounds. The phytochemicals present in ethanol extract (EE) were identified and quantified with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The pot culture technique was conducted in order to evaluate ethanol extract that mediates growth in tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum). This study was divided into two phases: vegetative and reproductive and included control sample, which received only water. EE 0.05 mg/mL, EE 0.1 mg/mL and EE 0.2 mg/mL treated plants showed an increase in root length, shoot length, number of secondary roots, plant height, total biomass, plant content, metabolites, secondary metabolites and enzyme activity. Our findings suggest that optimized growth, metabolism and antioxidant defence system can be obtained with 0.1 mg/mL of ethanol extract. The effect of these compounds on consumption and the impact on the environment were studied with computational chemistry and bioinformatics.

Keywords

Pot culture technique, Docking, Phytochemical, GCMS, Terminalia chebula, Lycopersicum esculentum, Biostimulant

References

  1. Lucini, L., et al. 2019. Inoculation of Rhizoglomus irregulare or Trichoderma atroviride differentially modulates metabolite profiling of wheat root exudates. Phytochem.,157: 158-167.
  2. Searchinger, T., et al. 2013. The great balancing act. World Resources Institute.
  3. Fiorilli, V., et al. 2018. Omics approaches revealed how arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances yield and resistance to leaf pathogen in wheat. Sci. Reports.8(1):1-18.
  4. Bulgari, R., et al. 2015. Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biol. Agric. Horticul.,31(1):1-17.
  5. Rouphael, Y. and G. Colla. 2020. Biostimulants in agriculture. Frontiers plant sci., 11:40.
  6. Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgarisPlant physiol.,24(1):1.
  7. Kirk, J.T.O. and R.L. Allen. 1965. Dependence of chloroplast pigment synthesis on protein synthesis: effect of actidione. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.,21(6): 523-530.
  8. Hedge, J.E, and B.T. Hofreiter. 1962. Carbohydrate chemistry. Academic Press, New York.
  9. Lowry, O.H., et al. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193(1): 265-275.
  10. Moore, S. and W.H. Stein. 1948. In Methods in enzymology. Ed S.P. Colowick and N.D. Kaplan. Academic Press. New York. pp 3:468.
  11. Makkar, H.P.S. 2003. Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage: A laboratory manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  12. Zhishen, J., T. Mengcheng and W. Jianming. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food chem.,64(4): 555-559.
  13. Reddy, K.P., et al. 1995. Effect of light and benzyladenine on dark treated growing rice leaves (Oryza sativa). I. Changes in chlorophyll content and catalase activity. Physiologia Plantarum. 63(1): 79-86.
  14. Mayer, A.M., E. Harel and R. Ben-Shaul. 1965. Assay of catechol oxidase—a critical comparison of methods. Phytochem.,5(4): 783-789.
  15. Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in-vitro. InMethods in enzymology (vol 105). Academic press. pp 121-126.
  16. Dhindsa, R.S., P. Plumb-Dhindsa and T.A. Thorpe. 1981. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid pero-xidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismu-tase and catalase. J. Exp. Botany. 32(1): 93-101.
  17. Cheng, F., et al. 2012. ADMET SAR: a comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52: 3099-3105. DOI: 10.1021/ci300367a.
  18. Arshad, M. 2018. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial assessment of some computationally bioactive 1,2-oxazole derivatives. Russian J. General Chem.,88(9): 1886-1891.
  19. Lipinski, C.A., et al. 2012. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. drug delivery reviews.64: 4-17.
  20. Kisiriko, M., et al. 2021. Phenolics from medicinal and aromatic plants: Characterisation and potential as biostimulants and bioprotectants. Mole-cules.26(21): 6343.
  21. Gedeon, S., et al. 2022. Application of biosti-mulants in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) to enhance plant growth and salt stress tolerance. Plants. 11(22): 3082.
  22. Guan, L., et al. 2019. ADMET-score–a comprehensive scoring function for evaluation of chemical drug-likeness. Medchemcomm., 10(1): 148-157.
  23. Farooq, M., et al. 2011. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest manage. Sci.,67(5): 493-506.
  24. Hernández-Herrera, R.M., et al. 2014. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. appl. Phycol., 26: 619-628.
  25. Hernández-Herrera, R.M., et al. 2018. Seaweed as potential plant growth stimulants for agriculture in Mexico. Hidrobiol., 28(1): 129-140.
  26. Al-Samarai, G.F., W.M. Mahdi and B.M. Al-Hilali. 2018. Reducing environmental pollution by chemical herbicides using natural plant derivatives– Allelopathy effect. Annals Agric. Env. Med.,25(3): 449-452.
  27. Chang, P.K., et al. 2014. Aspergillus: Introduction. InEncyclopedia of food microbiology (2nd edn). Elsevier Inc. pp 77-82.
  28. Makkar, H.P.S. 2003. Measurement of total phenolics and tannins using Folin-Ciocalteu method. In Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage: A laboratory manual. Springer, Dordrecht. pp 49-
    51.