A Comparative analysis of vehicle dynamics for electric Two-wheelers using Indian drive cycle

IJEP 44(8): 705-711 : Vol. 44 Issue. 8 (August 2024)

Devendra Vashist* and Bhaskar Pandey

Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, School of Engineering and Technology, Faridabad – 121 004, Haryana, India

Abstract

All around the world, electric vehicles (EVs) are being used and promoted as environment-friendly alternatives to IC engine-based vehicles. Following the worldwide trend, electric vehicles are emerging as a prospective mode of transportation in India. As Indian traffic condition variations are different as compared to developed countries, an understanding of the effect of various vehicle parameters on the operation and performance of EVs in Indian conditions is essential. Keeping this objective, the present research analyses the Indian drive cycle (IDC) with vehicle dynamics parameters, such as rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, acceleration, etc., with their effect on the performance of EVs. For the research two models of e-scooter were selected. Both vehicles have similar configurations except for their mass and projected area. There is a difference of 7.35% and 5.55% in mass and projected area, respectively, among the two-wheelers selected. After the analysis of traction torque and power requirement, the energy required for complete IDC has been calculated for each model. It is concluded from the analysis that there is a difference of approximately 6.68% in the efficiency of e-scooter models once both the models were test run under similar conditions on the road.

Keywords

Indian drive cycle, Tractive effort, gradient, Rolling resistance, Acceleration force, Aerodynamic drag

References

  1. Qiao, Q., et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in China: Combining the vehicle cycle and fuel cycle. Energy. 177: 222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.080.
  2. Li, C., et al. Multi-criteria analysis of policies for implementing clean energy vehicles in China. Energy Policy. 129: 826–840. doi: 10.10 16/j.enpol. 2019.03.002.
  3. Vashist, D. 2018. Technical challenges for using E-rickshaw as a mode of transport on Indian roads. Automobile Eng. Applications. 5(2): 31-40.
  4. Bubeck, S., J. Tomaschek and U. Fahl. 2016. Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany. Policy. 50: 63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.012.
  5. Palmer, K., et al. Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Appl. Energy. 209: 108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.089.
  6. Bindra, M. and D. Vashist. 2020. Particulate matter and NOx reduction techniques for internal combustion engine: A review.  Inst. Eng. India Ser. C.101: 1073–1082. DOI: 10.1007/s40032-020-00607-1.
  7. Vashist, D. and F. Mukhtar. 2020. Technical analysis for implementing BS-VI automotive emissions norms with respect to electric vehicle production by 2020 in India. J. Electric Hybrid Vehicles. 12(4): 304-314. DOI: 10.1504/IJEHV.2020. 1130 83.
  8. Vashist, D. 2019. Design analysis of a retrofit system for an electric two-wheeler. SAE technical paper 2019-28-2482. DOI: 10.4271/2019-28-24 82.
  9. Fil, H.E. and S.O. Akansu. 2022. Experimental investigation of diesel-ethanol fuel blends in a compression ignition engine. J. Energy Clean Env., 23(1): 139-151. DOI: 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEn v.v23.i1.110
  10. Sarkar, A., et al. Performance and emission study of ethanol-blended gasoline powered small VCR engine. Int. J. Energy Clean Env., 23(7): 1-12. DOI: 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2021038246.
  11. Thomas, S.J., et al. Sustainability analysis on rural livelihood systems with interventions in energy-water-food nexus. Int. J. Energy Clean Env., 23(8): 41-52. DOI: 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2 021038177.
  12. 2013. National electric mobility mission plan 2020. Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Government of India.
  13. 2019. Operational guidelines for delivery of demand incentice under FAME India scheme phase-II. Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Government of India. Available at: https://fame2.heavyindustries.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/Operational%20Guidelien%20FAME%20 PHASE-II.pdf.
  14. Niti Aayog and BCG. 2018. Transforming India’s mobility: A perspective. Niti Aayog and The Boston Consulting Group.
  15. 2017. White paper on electric vehicles adopting pure electric vehicles : Key policy enablers. Society indian Automobile Manufacturer.
  16. 2021. Status quo analysis of various segments of electric mobility and low carbon passenger road transport in India. Joint study by Federal Republic of Germany and Niti Aayog, India.
  17. Alkhalidi, A., et al. What are the barriers that prevent its adoption? Case study of battery electric vehicles. Int. j. energy clean env., 22 (1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2020 035391.
  18. Napa, N., et al. Heat transfer characteristics of electrochemical cell- A numerical study. 26th National and 4th International ISHMT-ASTFE heat and mass transfer Conference. Chennai. Proceedings, pp 1259-1265. DOI: 10.1615/IHMTC-2021. 1900.
  19. Kanth, J.R. and B.R. Ponangi. 2021. Design and analysis of cold plate for electric vehicle battery pack. 25th National and 3rd International ISHMT-ASTFE heat and mass transfer Conference (IHMTC-2019). Proceedings, pp 751-756. DOI: 10.1615/IHMTC-2019.1260.
  20. Yen, E., T. Han and B. Khalighi. 2017. Air-cooling concepts for Li-ion battery pack thermal management. Second thermal and fluids engineering Conference. Las Vegas, USA. Proceedings, pp 2311–2323. doi:1615/tfec2017.ihe.017214.
  21. Shanto, S.B., A. Datta and S. Mondal. 2021. Improved cooling system of Li-ion batteries by axial water flow through the core. 26th National and 4th International ISHMT-ASTFE heat and mass transfer c India. Proceedings, pp 949-955. DOI: 10.1615/IHMTC-2021.1430.
  22. Singh, V.K., et al. Electrical-thermal design of liquid cooled battery pack for electric vehicles. 26th National and 4th International ISHMT-ASTFE heat and mass transfer Conference. Chennai, India. Proceedings, pp 1159-1165. DOI: 10.1615/IH MTC-2021.1760.
  23. Yuan, C. and Y. Zhao. 2018. Research on the design improvement of thermal safety in multi-parallel lithium ion battery module. 3rd Thermal and fluids engineering Conference (TFEC). Fort Lauderdale, USA. Proceedings, pp 33-37. DOI: 10.1615/TFEC 2018.aes.022504.
  24. Narayanan, S., et al. Design and performance analysis of an advanced thermal battery for electric vehicle climate control. International heat transfer Conference. Kyoto, Japan. Proceedings, pp 983-991. DOI: 10.1615/IHTC15.ads.009289.
  25. Yu, L. M., A.Y. Xiong and Z.J. Zong. Fuzzy-logic-based acceleration control strategy for battery electric vehicles. In Design, manufacturing and mechatronics. pp 289-296. DOI: 10.1142/97898 14730518_0035.
  26. Ilis, G.G. 2017. COP improvement of electric vehicle battery thermal management system with an adsorption heat pump. Second thermal and fluids engineering Conference. Las Vegas, USA. Proceedings, pp 2495-2503. DOI: 10.1615/TFEC 2017.ist. 018033.
  27. Kothari, R., et al. Thermal management of electric vehicle battery modules with phase change materials. 24th National and 2nd International ISHMT-ASTFE heat and mass transfer Conference (IHMTC-2017). Proceedings, pp 2295-2300. DOI: 10.1615/IHMTC-2017.3200.
  28. Miri, I., A. Fotouhi and N. Ewin. 2021. Electric vehicle energy consumption modelling and estimation-A case study. J. Energy Res., 45(1): 501–520. doi: 10.1002/er.5700.
  29. Saitoh, T., D. Ando and K. Kurata. 2019. A grand design of future electric vehicle with fuel economy more than 100 km/liter. SAE technical paper 1999-01-2711. DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-2711.
  30. Varga, B.O., A. Sagoian and F. Mariasiu. 2019. Prediction of electric vehicle range: A comprehensive review of current issues and challenges. 12(5). doi: 10.3390/en12050946.
  31. Mruzek, M., et al. Analysis of parameters influencing electric vehicle range. Procedia Eng., 134: 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01. 056.
  32. Singh, R., et al. Design and assessment of an electric vehicle charging station using hybrid renewable energy. Int. J. Energy Clean Env., 23(6): 31-47. DOI: 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.20220 42580.
  33. Shumei, C., S. Beibei and W. Zhiyuan. 2022. Overview of magnetic coupler for electric vehicles dynamic wireless charging. China Electrotech-nical Soc., 37(3): 537-554.
  34. Wang, J., I. Besselink and H. Nijmeijer. 2018. Battery electric vehicle energy consumption prediction for a trip based on route information. Auto-mob. Eng., 232(11): 1528–1542. doi: 10.1177/095440 7017729938.
  35. Kumar, S., et al. Energy consumption in a motor vehicle based on Indian driving condition. Mater. Today. 33: 3912–3917. doi: 10.1016/j. matpr.2020.06.253.
  36. Hung, W.T., et al. Development of a practical driving cycle construction methodology: A case study in Hong Kong. Transp. Res. Part D : Transp. Env., 12(2): 115–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2007. 01.002.
  37. Mayakuntla, S.K. and A. Verma. 2018. A novel methodology for construction of driving cycles
    for Indian cities. Res. Part D : Transp.
    Env.,
    65: 725–735. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.10. 013.
  38. Kamble, S.H., T.V. Mathew and G.K. Sharma. 2009. Development of real-world driving cycle: Case study of Pune, India. Res. Part D : Transp. Env., 14(2): 132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.trd. 2008.11.008.
  39. 2022. Automobile domestic sales trends. Society of Indian Automobile Manufactures.
  40. Markel, T. and A. Simpson. 2017. Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology. World Electr. Veh. J., 1(1): 294–301. doi: 3390/wevj1010294.
  41. Tong, H.Y. and W.T. Hung. 2010. A framework for developing driving cycles with on-road driving data. Rev., 30(5): 589–615. doi: 10.1080/01441640903286134.
  42. Markel, T. and A. Simpson. 2007. Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle techno-logy. World Electric Vehicle J. 1(1): 294-301. DOI: 10.3390/wevj1010294.