IJEP 44(8): 712-719 : Vol. 44 Issue. 8 (August 2024)
Abhilasha G. Deshmukh1,2 and Kiran M. Tajne3*
1. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, PGTD of Computer and Electronics, Nagpur – 440 033, Maharashtra, India
2. G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur – 440 016, Maharashtra, India
2. Government College of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Nagpur – 441 108, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Industries provide necessary materials and employment opportunities. In the modern world, industries are an inseparable part of life. Without the enterprises one cannot expect life. While appreciating industrialization as a boon, it poses biggest threat to mankind as a source of air, water and land pollution. Indian political system has evolved to support great industrial growth but at the same time more attention should be paid to industrial waste management. Latest trend in the world of industrial water is to treat waste with more than one treatment process and it has been proven to be very effective in removal of colloidal and non-biodegradable pollutants. These integrated and optimized systems have added a lot to the performance of conventional or any individual treatment process. Combining two or more different treatment processes has opened a new field to investigate and attracted the researcher’s attention. This study is intended to review a popular low-cost treatment called moving bed biological reactor (MBBR). This technology was optimized by integrating other treatment methods, thus achieving the highest possible performance in treatment of heavily polluted wastewaters from various industries.
Keywords
Moving bed bioreactor, Wastewater treatment, Optimization, Biocarrier, Hydraulic conditions, Industrial wastewater, Chemical oxygen demand, Biochemical oxygen demand, Total organic carbon, Solid retention time, Hydraulic retention time
References
- Li, Z. and P. Yang. 2018. Review on physico-chemical, chemical and biological processes for pharmaceutical wastewater. IOP Conference Series Earth Env. Sci., 113(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/113/1/012185.
- Fazal, S., et al. 2015. Membrane separation technology on pharmaceutical wastewater by using membrane bioreactor (MBR). J. Env. Prot., 6(4): 299-307.
- Shi, X., et al. 2014. Sequential anarobic-aerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater with high salinity. Bioresour. Tech., 153: 79-86.
- Khudhair, D.N., et al. 2023. Upgrading the MBBR process to reduce excess sludge production in activated sludge system treating sewage. Water. 15(3): 408.
- Sayyahzadeh, A., H. Ganjidoust and B. Ayati. 2016. MBBR system performance improvement for petroleum hydrocarbon removal using modified media with activated carbon. Water Sci. Tech., 73(9): 2275-2283. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.013.
- Ferrentino, R., et al. 2018. Process performance optimization and mathematical modelling of a SBR-MBBR treatment at low oxygen concentration. Process Biochem., 75: 230-239.
- Qaderi, F., A.H. Sayahzadeh and M. Azizi. 2018. Efficiency optimization of petroleum wastewater treatment by using of serial moving bed biofilm reactors. J. Clean. Prod., 192: 665-677. DOI: 10.101 6/j/jclepro.2018.04.257.
- Su, Y., et al. 2021. A prepared early bio-carrier based on chitosan modified polyproylene fibres. Biochem. Eng. J., 165: 107824. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107824.
- Ashkanami, A., et al. 2019. Bio-carrier and operating temperature effect on ammonia removal from secondary wastewater effluents using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Sci. Total Env., 693.
- Shitu, A., et al. 2020. Performance of novel sponge bio-carrier in MBBR treating recirulating aquaculture systems wastewater. J. Env. Manage., 275: 11264. DOI: 10.1016/J.jenv-man.2020.111264.
- Barwal, A. and R. Chaudhary. 2014. To study the performance of bio-carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology and kinetics of biofilm for retrofitting the existing aerobic treatment systems: A review. Reviews Env. Sci. Biotech., 13(3): 285-299. DOI: 10.1007/s1157-014-9333-7.
- Biswas, K., M.W. Taylor and S.J. Turner. 2014. Successional development of biofilms in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) systems treating municipal wastewater. Appl. Micorobiol. Biotech., 98(3): 1429-1440. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5082-8.
- Patel, R.J., U.D. Patel and A.S. Nerurkar. 2021. Moving bed biofilm reactor developed with special microbial seed for denitrification of high nitrate containing wastewater. World J. Microbiol. Biotech., 37(4): 68. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-021-03035-0.
- Madan, S., R. Mata and A. Hussain. 2022. Advan-cement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR): A review. Appl. Water Sci., 12: 141. DOI: 10.1007/s132.
- Ahmadlouydarab, M. 2019. Application of lab-scale MBBR to treat industrial wastewater using K3 carriers: Effects of HRT, high COD influent and temperature. Int. J. Env. Sci. Natural Res.,20(2). doi: 10.19080/ijesnr.2019.20.556031.
- Kawan, J.A., et al. 2022. Effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance of a compact moving bed biofilm reactor for effluent polishing of treated sewage. Water. 14(1): 81.
- Nakhli, S.A.A., et al. 2014. Biological removal of phenol from saline wastewater using a moving bed biofilm reactor containing acclimated mixed consortia. SpringerPlus. 3: 112. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-112.
- Santos, A.D., et al. 2020. Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for diary wastewater treatment. Energy Reports. 6(8): 340-344.
- Magnisali, E.Y., Q. Vaygenas and V. Dimitris. 2021. Electro-coagulation as a revived wastewater treatment method-practical approaches: A review. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 1-17.
- Ibrahim, D.T. 2021. Study hybrid treatment technologies using MBBR with electroflotation for textile wastewater. J. Physics Conf. Series. 2114: 012052.
- Zkeri, E., et al. 2021. Comparing the use of a two-stage MBBR system with a methanogenic MBBR coupled with a microalgae reactor for medium-strength dairy wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Tech., 323: 124629. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotech.2020 .124629.
- Ribera-Pi, J., et al. 2020. Coagulation-flocculation and moving bed biofilm reactor as pre-treatment for water recycling in the petrochemical industry. Sci. Total Env., 715: 136800. DOI: 10.1016/j.sc itotenv.2010. 136800.
- Edefella, E., et al. 2021. MBBRs as post-treatment to ozonation: Degradation of transformation products and ozone-resistant micropollutants. Sci. Total Env., 754: 142103.
- Govindaraju, R.A., et al. 2022. Performance evaluation of 1 MLD MBBR type sewage treatment plant. Indian J. Microbial. Res., 9(2): 149-152. DOI: 10. 18231/j.pijmr.2022.027.
- Colic, M., et al. 2012. Enabling the performance of the MBBR installed to treatment processing wastewater. Proceedings Water Env. Fed., 13: 3358-3374. DOI: 10.2175/193864708788733378.
- Jasem, Y.I., G.F. Jumaha and A.H. Ghawi. 2018. Treatment of medical wastewater by moving bed bioreactor system. J. Ecol. Eng., 19(3): 136-140. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/86152.
- Barkar, R.P., M.L. Gulhane and A.J. Kotangale. 2013. Moving bed biofilm reactor- A new perspective in wastewater treatement. IOSR J. Env. Sci., 6: 61.
- Nair, A.M., et al. 2020. Real-time monitoring of enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a multistage EBPR-MBBR using a soft-sensor of phosphates. 37: 101494. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020. 101494.
- Asgari, R.S., et al. 2017. Modelling of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) efficiency on hospital wastewater (HW) treatment: A comprehensive analysis on BOD and COD removal. Int. J. Env. Sci. Tech., 14: 841–852.
- Abu Bakar, S.N.H., et al. 2020. Performance of a laboratory-scale moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and its microbial diversity in palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. Process Safety Env. Prot., 142: 325-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.004.
- Matheus, M., et al. 2020. Assessing the impact of hydraulic conditions and absence of pre-treatment on the treatability of pesticide formulation plant wastewater in a moving bed biofilm reactor. J. Water Process Eng., 36: 101243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020. 10124.
- Boyle, K. 2019. Optimization of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) operation for brewery wastewater treatment. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
- Davaria, N., et al. 2021. Investigate the simultaneous effect of pH, temperature and hydraulic retention time in a moving bed biofilm reactor: Optimization and modelling using response surface methodology. Desalination Water Treatment. 235 (2021): 80–91. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27617.
- Bhandari, D. and R.K. Garg. 2017. Effect of indus-tralization on environment (Indian scenario). Global J. Res. Analysis. 4(12): 281-282.
- De la Casa, J.A. and E. Castro. 2018. Fuel savings and carbon dioxide emission reduction in a fired clay bricks production plant using olive oil wastes: A simulation study. J. Clean. Prod., 185: 230-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelepro. 2018.03.010.
- Jacob, M., et al. 2023. Moving bed biofilm reactor performance on saline produced water (upstream oil and gas) at very low hydraulic retention time. Waste. 1(1): 295-312.
- Lusinier, N., et al. 2021. Application of moving bed biofilm reactor and fixed bed hybrid biological reactor for oilfield produced water treatment: Influence of total dissolved solids concentration. Energies. 14(21): 7297. DOI: 10.3390/en 4217297.
- Shi, Y., et al. 2015. Treatment of oil sands process-affected water using moving bed biofilm reactors: With and without ozone pre-treatment. Bioresour. Tech., 192: 219-227. DOI: 10.1016/J.B IORTECH.2015.05.068.
- Jing, J.Y., J. Feng and W.Y. Li. 2009. Carrier effects on oxygen mass transfer behaviour in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Asia Pacific J. Chem. Eng., 4(5): 618-623. DOI: 10.1002./apj.302.
- Dias, J., et al. 2018. Impact on carrier on oxygen transfer and wastewater hydrodynamics on a moving attached growth system. Chem. Eng. J., 351: 399-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.028.
- Nof, K., et al. 2013. Improving particles separation after moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) systems by media clarifier. Proceedings Water Env. Fed., 2013(13): 3928-3933.