Studies on Geo-Polymer Concrete as an Ecological Alternative

IJEP 44(8): 751-757 : Vol. 44 Issue. 8 (August 2024)

P. Siva Kumar, N.S.C. Chaitanya*, I. Krishna Chaitanya and Monangi Murali

 Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam – 531 162, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Geo-polymer concrete (GPC) is often considered a sustainable alternative to conventional cement-based concrete. The performance of GPC is influenced by several parameters, including curing method, chemical composition and material grading. The primary objective of this study is to assess the viability of employing glass powder concrete (GPC) as an alternative to traditional concrete. In order to determine the suitability of GPC, a series of tests were done to analyze its workability, compressive strength and water absorption characteristics. In conclusion, this research provides evidence to support the assertion that GPC presents a feasible and ecologically sustainable substitute for cement-based concrete. This study offers significant insights into the efficacy and durability of GPC cubes across various levels of quality.

Keywords

Geo-polymer concrete, sustainable alternative, Ground granulated blast furnace slag, Rice husk ash, Meta-kaolin, compressive strength

References

  1. Das, S.K., J. Mishra and S.M. Mustakin. 2018. Rice husk ash as a potential source material for geo-polymer concrete: A review. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 13(7): 81-84.
  2. Patil, S.V., B. Karikatti and M.K. Chitawadagi. 2018. Granulated plast-furnace slage (GGBS) based geopolymer concrete- Review. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng., DOI: 10.29294/IJASE.5.1.2018.789-885.
  3. Albidah, A., et al. 2021. Characteristic of meta-kaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters. J. Mater. Res. Tech., 10: 84-98.
  4. Blash, A.M.A. and T.V.S. Vara Lakshmi. 2018. Studies on role of silica fume in geopolymer concrete and its properties. Int. J. Civil Eng. Tech., 9(7): 112-122.
  5. Manjunath, G.S., et al. 2014. Strength and durability performance of open air cured alkali activated concrete. J. Civil Eng. Tech. Res., 2(1): 147-157.
  6. Kumar, S. and R. Kumar. 2014. Geopolymer cement for low carbon economy. Indian Concrete J., 88(7): 29-37.
  7. Rajamane, N., M.C. Nataraja and R. Jeyalakshmi. 2014. Pozzalaniec industrial waste based geo-polymer concretes with low carbon footprint. Indian Concrete J., 88(7): 49-68.
  8. Rangar, B.V. 2014. Geopolymer conrete for environmental protection. Indian Concrete J., 88(4): 41-59.
  9. Krishna, A.S., P. Polaraju and D.R. Babu. 2023. Modelling of strength properties of geopolymer concrete beam. Mater. Today Proceedings. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.037.
  10. Padmakar, M., B. Barhmaiah and M. Leela Priyanka. 2021. Characteristic compressive strength of a geopolymer concrete. Mater. Today Proceedings. 37(2): 2219-2222. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020. 07.656.
  11. Krishna, T.I., et al. 2021. Experimental research of hybrid fibres based geopolymer concrete. Mater. Today Proceedings. 45(7): 3678-3683. DOI: 10.10 16/j.matpr.2021.02.078.
  12. Xavier, S.B., et al. 2021. Effect of calcium on natural iron rich geopolymeric binder. Mater. Today Proceedings. 45(6): 4646-4652.
  13. Devi, R.K., et al. 2021. A study on evolution of geo-polymer concrete. Mater. Today Proceedings. 46(9): 3975-3978. DOI: 10.1016/j. matpr. 2021. 02.524.
  14. Jothilingam, M. and V. Preethi. 2021. Feasibility, compressive strength and utilization of red mud in geopolymer concrete for sustainable constructions. Mater. Today Proceedings. 45 (7): 7016-7022. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.535.
  15. IS 455. 1989. Portland slag cement- Specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  16. IS 12269. 1987. 53 grade ordinary Portland cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  17. IS 4031-1. 1996. Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Part 1: Determination of fineness by dry sieving. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  18. IS 4032. 1985. Method of chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  19. BS 6699. 1992. Specification for ground granulated blast furnace slag for use with Portland cement. British Standard, London, UK.
  20. IS 2386-1. 1963. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete. Part I: Particle size and shape. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  21. IS 383. 1970. Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  22. IS 10262. 2009. Guidelines for concrete mix design proportioning. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  23. BS 1881-5. 1970. Methods of testing concrete. Part 5: Methods of testing hardened concrete for other than strength. British Standard, London, UK.
  24. Hindawi. 2020. Rebound hammer test : An investigation into its reliability in applications on concrete structures. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 6450183.
  25. Salonia, P., Y.Y.L. Thong and M. Phamc. 2021. Influence of Portland cement on performance of fine rice husk ash geopolymer contrete: Strength and permeability properties. Constr. Build. Mater., 300(6): 124321. DOI: 10.1016.j.conbuildmat.202 1.124321.
  26. Jawahar, J.G. and A. Bhavana. 2013. Acid attack on flyash and GGBS blended geopolymer concrete using different fine aggregates. Int. J. Sci. Res., 5(8): 1012-1015.