Evaluation of Soil Quality Monitoring and Land Restoration in Ecological Restoration Areas of JCF, Northern Jharkhand, India

IJEP 45(1): 77-85 : Vol. 45 Issue. 1 (January 2025)

Bidisha Ganguly and L. B. Singh*

Binod Bihari Mahto Koyalanchal University, Department of Life Science (Zoology), Dhanbad – 826 004, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

The current investigation’s objectives are to determine the restoration of the ecosystem due to restoration programmes on overburden dumps started by Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), Dhanbad. The land restoration was analyzed by remote sensing and GIS datasets for ten-year gaps in 2013 and 2023. The landuse/land cover (LULC) analysis shows an increase in coal mine areas and industrial areas built nearby. Due to the ecological restoration programmes, the vegetation and waterbodies are sustained enough for the living of the nearby people. The pedological parameters of four ecological restoration areas have been studied and it has been found that the parameters are sufficient for the growth of new plants. The multipurpose plants planted and the native plants grown on the sites had been studied with their socio-economic benefits. The insects, also called primary consumers, have been studied in the ecological restoration areas. The presence of Orthopteran and Lepidopteran species indicates the complexity of the ecosystem, which needs further studies. 

Keywords

Ecological restoration, Ecological indicators, Land reclamation, Landuse and land change, Pedological parameters, Sustainability

References

  1. Dwivedi, R.S. 2002. Spatio-temporal characterization of soil degradation. Trop. Ecol., 43: 75–90.
  2. Areendran, G., et al. 2013. Landuse/land cover change dynamics analysis in mining areas of Singrauli district in Madhya Pradesh, India. Trop. Ecol., 54: 239–250.
  3. Mehta, P.S. 2002. The Indian mining sector: Effects on the environment and FDI inflows. CCNM global forum on international investment. Conference on Foreign direct investment and the environment – Lessons to be learned from the mining sector. OECD, Paris, France.
  4. Bian, Z., et al. 2010. Environmental issues from coal mining and their solutions. Mining Sci. Tech., 20: 215–223.
  5. Zendehboudi, S. and A. Bahadori. 2017. Production methods in shale oil reservoirs (chapter 8). In Shale oil and gas handbook: Theory, technologies and challenges. Gulf Professional Publishing. pp 285-310.
  6. Down, C.G. and J. Stocks. 1977. The environmental impact of mining. Applied Science Publisher, London.
  7. Bell, F.G., et al. 2001. Environmental impacts associated with an abandoned mine in the Witbank coalfield, South Africa. Int. J. Coal Geol., 45: 195–216.
  8. Sharma, K. and S. Kushwaha. 2005. Coal mining impact on landuse/land cover in Jaintia hills district of Meghalaya, India using remote sensing and GIS technique. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi.
  9. Kumar, A., et al. 2020. Bio-remediation approaches for alleviation of cadmium contamination in natural resources. Chemosphere. 268: 128855. DOI: 10.1 016/j.chem-osphere.2020.128855.
  10. Routson, R.C., R.E. Wildung and R.M. Bean. 1979. A review of the environmental impact of ground disposal of oil shale wastes. J. Env. Qual., 8: 14-19.
  11. Liu, D.X., H.Y. Wang and D.W. Zheng. 2009. World progress of oil shale in-situ exploitation methods. Nat. Gas Ind., 5: 128–132.
  12. Hu, S., et al. 2019. The influence of oil shale in-situ mining on groundwater environment: a water rock interaction study. Chemosphere. 228: 384-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.04.142.
  13. Prakash, A. and R.P. Gupta. 1998. Landuse mapping and change detection in a coal mining area- a case study in the Jharia coalfield, India. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 19(3): 391-410. DOI: 10.1080/0143 11698216053.
  14. Ghosh, R. 1989. Mining in Jharia coalfield, Eastern India: An estimation of Its impact index. J. Geol. Soc. India. 33: 353-360.
  15. Green, K., et al. 1994. Using remote sensing to detect and monitor landcover and landuse change. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 60: 331–337.
  16. Pandey, A.C., et al. 2002. Landuse land cover mapping through digital image processing of satellite data– A case study from Panchkula, Ambala and Yamunanger districts, Haryana state, India. Geo-spatial World.
  17. Schejbal, C. 1995. Problems of mines closure and reviving of landscape in the mining area. International Conference, Beijing, China. Proceedings, pp 681-691.
  18. Simmons, J.A., et al. 2008. Forest to reclaimed mine landuse change leads to altered ecosystem structure and function. Ecol. Applications. 18: 104-118.
  19. PD. 2020. Time for nature biodiversity. Paryavaran Darpan. V(2).
  20. UNESCO, 1985. Living in the environment. UNESCO/UNEP.
  21. Chauhan, M., M. Kumar and A. Kumar. 2020. Impact of carbon stocks of Anogeissus latifolia on climate change and socio-economic development: a case study of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Water Air Soil Poll., 231: 436. doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04803-8.
  22. Das, R. and S.K. Maiti. 2016. Importance of carbon fractionation for the estimation of carbon sequestration in reclaimed coalmine soils- a case study from Jharia coalfields, Jharkhand, India. Ecol. Eng. 90: 135–140. DOI: 10.1016/j. ecoleng. 2016. 01. 025.
  23. Landsat Satellite. 2023. Landsat 8. USGS. Available at: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellites/landsat-8/.
  24. Kumar, D., et al. 2021. Integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources influences the nutrient use of efficiencies of fodder oats (Avena sativa). Indian J. Agron., 66(4): 466-473.
  25. Dutta, R.K. and M. Agrawal. 2003. Restoration of opencast coal mine spoil by planting exotic tree species: a case study in dry tropical region. Ecol. Eng., 21(2): 143–151.
  26. Courtney, R., G. Mullen and T. Harrington. 2009. An evaluation of revegetation succession bauxite residue. Restor. Ecol., 17(3): 350–358.
  27. Liu, X., et al. 2016. Changes in soil properties in the soil profile after mining and reclamation in an opencast coal mine on the Loess plateau, China. Ecol. Eng., 98: 228-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng. 2016.10.078.
  28. Kumar, V., A. Chandra and Z. Usmani. 2016. Impact of coal mining on soil properties and their efficient eco-restoration. Int. J. Energy Tech. Policy 13: 158–165. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/003396.
  29. Kekane, S.S., et al. 2015. A review on physico-chemical properties of soil. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 3 (4): 29–32.
  30. Deshmukh, K.K. 2012. Studies on chemical characteristics and classification of soils from Sanga-mner area, Ahmadnagar district, Maharastra. Rasa-yan J. Chem., 5 (1):74–85.
  31. Dutta, M. and M. Ram. 1993. Status of micronutrient in some soil series of Tripura. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41 (4): 776–777.
  32. Tale, S.K. and S. Ingole. 2015. A review on role of physico-chemical properties in soil quality. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett., 4 (13): 57–66.
  33. Maiti, S.K. 2013. Eco-restoration of the coalmine degraded lands. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-0851-8.
  34. Thakur, T.K., et. al. 2022. Assessment of land degradation and restoration in coal mines of Central India: A time series analysis. Ecol. Eng., 175: 106493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106493.
  35. Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  36. Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
  37. Lavishkar, A., et al. 2020. Economic analysis of wheat and Dalbergia sissoo based agrisilviculture system in Central India. Int. J. Chem. Studies. 8 (2): 703–707.
  38. Abdullah, M. and M. Rafay. 2021. Ecology of Dalbergia sissoo. In Dalbergia sissoo: Biology, ecology and sustainable agroforestry. Ed S. Ijaz and I.U. Haq. CRC Press, Boca Ratan.
  39. Pande, P. 2021. Economic importance of Shorea robusta. Green Clean Guide.
  40. Vasava, D., et al. 2018. Bael tree (Angle marmelos (L.) Correa): importance, biology, propagation and future perspective. Trees. 32(5): 1165-1198.
  41. Rahman, M.A. and R. Amin. 2003. Monograph on arjun (Terminalia arjuna). Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
  42. Verma, P., et al. 2017. Scaling-up an indigenous tree (Gaemelina arborea) based on agroforestry systems in India. Int. J. Sci. Qualitative Analysis. 3(6): 73-77. Doi: 10.11648/j.fem20170306.11.
  43. Sharma, K., et al. 2020. Bahunia variegate: a comprehensive review on bioactive compounds, health benefits and utilization. Oriental Pharmacy Experimental Medicine. 21: 645-653. DOI: 10.1007/s135 96-020-00472-4.
  44. Adhikari, P.Y., et al. 2023. Ficus species (Ficus auriculata Lou., Ficus benghalensis L., Ficus caria L, Ficus riligiosa L, Ficus semicordata Buch. Ham.ex Sm) (chapter 18). In Himalayan fruits and berries: Bioactive compounds, uses and neutraceutical potential. pp 171-182.
  45. Richard, O., A. Michael and Z. Stefan. 2019. Comparison of socio-economic and ecological benefits of bamboo and trees: Perspective of local communities in southwestern, Ghana. Southern Forests: J. Forest Sci., 81: 255-260.
  46. Gochera, A. and H. Worku. 2002. Magnifera indica (L.) tree as agroforestry component: Environment and socio-economic roles in Abaya-Chamo catch-ments of southern Rift valley of Ethiopia. Cogent food Agric., 8(1): 2098587.
  47. Mishra, M., R. Prasad and P.C. Kotwal. 2010. Socio-economic issues in wild edible fruit collection of Anola (Embilica officinalis Gaertn) in tropical dry forests of central India. Search Res., 3: 64-70.
  48. Mia, G.M., et al. 2018. Transformation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) orchard in multi-story agroforestry increases system productivity. Agroforestry systems. 92: 1687-1697. DOI: 10.10 07/s10457-017-0118-1.
  49. Cohen, M.M. 2014. Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum): A herb of all reasons. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med., 5(4): 251-259.
  50. Sharma, R.S., et al. 2022. Economics of lemongrass cultivation in Jharkhand state. Eco. Affairs. 67 (4): 505-510.
  51. Raju, N.S.H., et al. 2018. Reduction and and reposition of uterine prolapse by using Mimosa pudica leave paste in non-descriptive goat. J. entomol. zool. Studies. 6(6): 573-575.
  52. Ganguly, B. and L.B. Singh. 2023. Effects of temperature and rainfall pattern on the abundance of Orthopteran insects in coal mines ecological restoration areas of Jharia coalfields, Jharkhand, India. J. Adv. Zool., 44(4): 181-186.