Spatial Strategic Planning in Wetlands to Support Sustainable Development of Food Security Based on Standing Crop Data of Rice using GIS Application and Land Evaluation Approach

IJEP 45(1): 94-100 : Vol. 45 Issue. 1 (January 2025)

Sri Agustini1, Wahyu Adi Nugroho2, Neneng Ratna Purnamasari1, Sri Wahyuni Manwan1 and Andy Bhermana2*

1. National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia, Research Center for Horticulture, Jakarta Pusat 10340, Indonesia
2. National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia, Research Center for Food Crops, Jakarta Pusat 10340, Indonesia

Abstract

One of the main issues for food security that has been implemented by the central government of Indonesia is to encourage local government in Kotawaringin Timur Regency to increase rice productivity. Several challenges that should be faced include land availability and suboptimal lands in wetlands. In order to achieve sustainability, appropriate spatial planning should be then designed. This study aimed to develop spatial planning and concept for rice development in wetlands based on standing crop data that provide information on landuse for rice farming. The application of geographic information system (GIS) technology was operated to generate the information in the form of spatial and tabular data as basic analysis for assisting in the planning process for landuse. The procedure of land evaluation was also used in this study to determine the land suitability of rice that was represented as agricultural land regions for food crops within the GIS environment. Decision-making that can be established includes land allocation for intensification and extensification zone as recommended landuse planning policy to support food policy and area development in wetlands of Kotawaringin Timur Regency. In the case study of Kotawaringin Timur Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, the result showed spatial distribution of both intensification and extensification areas with a total of 10.145 ha (3.52%) and 277,662 ha (96.48%). Specific landuse policies and programme can then be formulated and planned in the utilization of agricultural lands for rice farming development.

Keywords

Planning, Spatial, Sustainable, Landuse, Rice farming

References

  1. Zahri, I., et al. 2018. Comparing rice farming apperance of different agroecosystem in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Bulgerian J. Agric. Sci., 24 (2): 189–198.
  2. Laroche, M. 2017. Agroecology and sustainable development. Field projects- Advocacy for small-holders. Secours Catholique, Caritas, France.
  3. Altiery, M.A. 2015. Agroecology: Key concepts, principles and practices. Main learning points from training course on agroecology in Solo, Indonesia (5-9 June 2013) and Lusaka, Zambia (20-24 April 2015). Third World Network and SOCLA 2015.
  4. Nimisha, T., et al. 2015. Agroecology and susta-inability of agriculture in India: An overview. EC Agric., 2(1): 241-248.
  5. Metternicht, G. 2017. Landuse planning. Global Land Outlook. Working paper. UNCCD.
  6. BPS. 2022. Kotawaringin Timur Regency in figures 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik.
  7. BBSDLP. 2011. Land evaluation for agricultural commodities: Technical instructions. Center for Research and Development of Agricultural Land Resources, Agricultural Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia.
  8. Menon, A.R.R. 2012. Remote sensing application in agriculture and forestry. Kerala Environment Congress 2012: Agriculture and Environment. Thiruvananthapuram. Proceedings, pp 222-235.
  9. Son, N.T. and P.S. Rajendra. 2008. GIS-assisted land evaluation for agricultural development in Mekong Delta, Southern Vietnam. J. Sustain. Develop. Afrika. 10(2): 875-884.
  10. Hardjowigeno, S. and Widiatmaka. 2011. Evaluation of land suitability and landuse planning. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
  11. Rahman, M.A.E.A., A. Natarajan. and H. Rajendra. 2016. Assessment of land suitability and capability by integrating remote sensing and GIS for agriculture in Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, India. Egyptian J. Remote Sensing Space Sci., 19: 125-141.
  12. Bhermana, A., et al. 2002. Determination of agricultural land regions using agroecological zone (AEZ) approach and geographic information system. A case study of Kotawaringin Barat Regency, Kali-mantan, Indonesia. The Malaysian Society of Soil Science Conference. Application of modern tools in agriculture. Proceedings, pp 36-39.
  13. Goodchild, M., H. Robert and W. Stepen. 1992. Integrating GIS and spatial data analysis: Problem and possibilities. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Systems. 6(5): 407-423.
  14. Davis, F.W., et al. 1991. Environmental analysis using integrated GIS and remotely sensed data: Some research needs and priorities. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sensing. 57(6): 689-697.
  15. Wahyunto, H., et al. 2016. Technical instructions: Guidelines for land suitability assessment for strategic agricultural commodities. Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Bogor, Indonesia.
  16. Panhalkar, S. 2011. Land capability classification for integrated watershed development by applying remote sensing and GIS techniques. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 6(4): 46-55.
  17. Ritung, S., et al. 2011. Technical guidelines for land evaluation for agricultural commodities (revised edition). Center for Research and Development of Agricultural Land Resources, Agricultural Research and Development Agency, Bogor, Indonesia.
  18. Bhermana, A., et al. 2013. The combination of land resource evaluation approach and GIS application to determine prime commodities for agricultural landuse planning at developed areas: Case study of Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 8(12): 766-770.
  19. Webster C.C. and P.N. Wilson. 1980. Agriculture in the tropics (2nd edn). Longman Publishing Group.
  20. Susanti, E., et al. 2021. Updating of the agro-climate resources map of Indonesia to support agricultural planning. J. Tanah Iklim. 45(1): 47-58.
  21. BBSDLP. 2000. The mapping of agricultural commodities based on agroecological zone scale of 50,000. Indonesian Agricultural Department, Centre for Soil and Agroclimare Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
  22. BBSDLP. 2016. National soil classification: Technical instructions. Agricultural Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia.
  23. Jahanshiri, E., et al. 2020. A land evaluation framework for agricultural diversification. Sustain., 12: 3110.
  24. Noor, M., Masganti and F. Agus. 2014. Formation and characteristics of Indonesian tropical peat. In Indonesian peatlands: Formation, characteristics and potential to support food security (revised edition). IAARD Press. pp 7-32.
  25. Noor, H., et al. 2013. Swamplands: Research and development. IAARD Press, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  26. Wignyosukarto, B.S. 2013. Leaching and flushing of acidity in the reclamation of acid sulphate soil, Kalimantan, Indonesia. Irrig. Drain. 62: 75–81.
  27. Anda, M., A. Siswanto and R. Subandiono. 2009. Properties of organic and acid sulphate soils and water of a ‘reclaimed’ tidal backswamp in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Geoderma. 149: 54–65.
  28. Sulaiman, A.A., Y. Sulaeman and B. Minasny. 2019. A framework for the development of wetland for agricultural use in Indonesia. Resour., 8(34): 1-
    16.
  29. Duraisamy, V., et al. 2018. A comparative assessment of land suitability evaluation methods for agricultural landuse planning at village level. Landuse policy. 79: 146–163.
  30. FAO. 2007. Land evaluation: Towards a revised framework. Land and water discussion. Food and Agricultural Organization.
  31. Mumby, P.J., et al. 1997. Measurement of sea-grass standing crop using satellite and digital airborne remote sensing. Marine Ecol. Progress Series. 59: 51-60.
  32. SGA. 2015. Introduction to landuse planning. Workshop 1: Land use and transportation. M2D2- Multi-modal development and delivery. Smart Growth America.
  33. Alexiadis, S., C. Ladias and N. Hasanagas. 2013. A regional perspective of the common agricultural policy. Land Use Policy. 30: 665-669.
  34. Ahlqvist, O. 2009. Overlay (in GIS). In International encyclopedia of human geography (vol 8). Ed R. Kitchin and N. Thrift. pp 48–55.
  35. Hans, J.M.G., et al. 2015. Potential of extensi-fication of European agriculture for a more sustainable food system, focusing on nitrogen. Env. Res. Lett., 10: 025002.